Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Post-acquisition ETD spectral processing for increased peptide identifications

Reputable Mentor II
Reputable Mentor II
Good DM, Wenger CD, McAlister GC, Bai DL, Hunt DF, Coon JJ.
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2009 Aug;20(8):1435-40.
Tandem mass spectra (MS/MS) produced using electron transfer dissociation (ETD) differ from those derived from collision-activated dissociation (CAD) in several important ways. Foremost, the predominant fragment ion series are different: c- and z(*)-type ions are favored in ETD spectra while b- and y-type ions comprise the bulk of the fragments in CAD spectra. Additionally, ETD spectra possess charge-reduced precursors and unique neutral losses. Most database search algorithms were designed to analyze CAD spectra, and have only recently been adapted to accommodate c- and z(*)-type ions; therefore, inclusion of these additional spectral features can hinder identification, leading to lower confidence scores and decreased sensitivity. Because of this, it is important to pre-process spectral data before submission to a database search to remove those features that cause complications. Here, we demonstrate the effects of removing these features on the number of unique peptide identifications at a 1% false discovery rate (FDR) using the open mass spectrometry search algorithm (OMSSA). When analyzing two biologic replicates of a yeast protein extract in three total analyses, the number of unique identifications with a approximately 1% FDR increased from 4611 to 5931 upon spectral pre-processing--an increase of approximately 28.6%. We outline the most effective pre-processing methods, and provide free software containing these algorithms.
Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.
Version history
Last update:
‎10-15-2021 11:43 AM
Updated by: